 RailroadForums.Com |
|
|
|
|
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
4
|
710
|
Tue December 11, 2007
|
|
 |
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
Average Rating
|
|
100% of reviewers
|
$1,245.00
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
supersize
|
|
Description:
|
Features
Lens construction: 18 elements in 15 groups
Diagonal angle of view: 34°-12°
Focus adjustment: Inner focusing system with USM
Closest focusing distance: 1.5m / 4.9ft
Zoom system: Rotating type
Filter size: 77mm
One of the finest telephoto zoom lenses in the EF line, comparable to a single focal length lens
One of the finest telephoto zoom lenses in the EF line, comparable to a single focal length lens. It has four UD-glass elements to correct chromatic aberrations. The newly designed multiple zoom groups for inner focusing bring high image quality throughout the entire zooming range. Compatible with Extender EF 1.4x and 2x.
|
|
Keywords:
|
EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM
|
|
|
|
|
Author
|
|
Grayfeil
Member
Registered: February 2006
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 13
|
|
Review Date: Sat July 28, 2007
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: $1,200.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
This is my favorite lens to use for rail photography. It is extremly sharp and fast focusing. It is a bit pricy, but this will fast become the only lens that you will want to use. My brother liked mine so much he went and purchased one himself.
I have used mine on a Canon Digital Rebel,10D, and 20D.
|
|
|
|
olson4107
Member
Registered: October 2007
|
|
Review Date: Thu October 18, 2007
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: $980.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Constant aperture throughout zoom range
|
|
Cons:
|
Weight
|
|
This lens is my favorite field lens. It allows great depth of field at all focal lengths.
Using this with the 1Ds means a substantial weight for long periods of time while traipsing though fields to gain that optimal angle of the track. However, the quality of sharpness with the depth of field makes the effort worth it.
This lens' big brother, the image stabilized version (IS) may be viable for very low light situations in photography but, with normal outdoor light quality, I have not found the IS benefits noticeable or the cost increase effective.
|
|
|
|
|
AustinSVT
Member
Registered: September 2006
Posts: 6
|
|
Review Date: Tue November 13, 2007
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: $1,200.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
2.8 L Glass!!!
|
|
Cons:
|
Light weight wallet
|
|
I love this lens! Fast and excellent quality images. No regrets on not getting the IS model either, even with panning images (ex: aerial plane shots).
|
|
|
|
|
CPKirkie
Conductor
Registered: September 2002
Location: Washougal, WA
Posts: 199
|
|
Review Date: Tue December 11, 2007
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: $1,600.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Fast f2.8, tack sharp, tripod collar, good lens hood, very rugged
|
|
Cons:
|
weight
|
|
I have been using this lens for over 11 years. It is a workhorse, surviving a couple of crashes out in the field. In my experience, it works well with the 1.4x and 2.0x extenders. For digital images, the doubler REALLY gets you out there!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by: ReviewPost PHP vB3 Enhanced
Copyright 2006 All Enthusiast, Inc.
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:18 AM.
