Ramped/raised curb lane streetcar stops

Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a commision from some of the links and ads shown on this website (Learn More Here)

RailroadBookstore.com - An online railroad bookstore featuring a curated selection of new and used railroad books. Railroad pictorials, railroad history, steam locomotives, passenger trains, modern railroading. Hundreds of titles available, most at discount prices! We also have a video and children's book section.

ModelRailroadBookstore.com - An online model railroad bookstore featuring a curated selection of new and used books. Layout design, track plans, scenery and structure building, wiring, DCC, Tinplate, Toy Trains, Price Guides and more.

Which is the best default trafficable kerb access setup?

  • Setup A

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Setup B

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Concur with the original poster

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Can't decide or don't care

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
#1
In Melbourne we have a rebuilt a few tram stops so as to improve access to both high and low floor trams simply by raising the curb lane so as the be (almost) the same height above the TOR as the entrances. The first such stop was on Danks street in a bayside suburb called Albert Park.



Next was on MacArthur street near Parliment railway station.
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HWDZvkmHAU[/YOUTUBE]

Both are single trafficable stops, with one lane per direction, both traversing the platform. But there are now another two in Bridge road which are double trafficable, with an additional lane in each direction following the tram tracks, I have not found any photos, so here is an artists impression.



Both types of trafficacle kerb access stops can be achieved in three ways, in all the ones we have so far use option A, there are short stretches of curb lane that are the desired platform height above the rest of the road. Option B, suitable where stops are located on the tops of hills or under (low) bridges, is to lower a stretch of streetcar tracks the desired platform height. Option AB is the raise the curb lane by a portion of the desired platform height and also lower the track by the remaining portion, for example, lowering the tracks by half the platform height and raising the curb lane by the same amount. If the desired platform height above rail level is no more than the height of the sidewalk above the edge of the curb lane, option A is the best default. If the desired platform height is any higher, than option AB is best, bringing the curb lane to sidewalk level and lowering the tracks by the difference between the sidewalk level and the desired platform height.

Is they any potential to adopt these in North America? Such as in Portland, and in particular, operators that prefer unidirectional streetcars with doors on only the right.
 





RailroadForums.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com

Top